Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joe Douglas's avatar

I don't know if I've changed that much from 10 years ago. I had Netflix then, I have Netflix now. I went to the cinema to see films of interest, I do so now. I think the biggest change is the quality being produced. So much of it is just uninteresting or bad, and the good series gets cancelled by the service after one season so why even bother?

Expand full comment
Emma Vivian's avatar

My husband and I live in LA and took great interest in reading this BBC article this weekend (we are both English.) My husband is a film and TV composer, and it's been the toughest year for him since we first moved out here ten years ago. He's lucky to finally be working again now that some of his shows have started up additional seasons. But it's been so tough for ALL our friends in the industry. My take is that it comes down to risk aversion on the part of the studios and screening services due to their NEED to make a profit. On social media, for the most part, people follow their creativity and inspiration for themselves and NOT for their shareholders. Time and again, Netflix will create an amazing new series that gets cancelled immediately based on their algorithm for what they consider a successful show. Whereas you have other shows that aren't as good being renewed for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th seasons because so many people watch them. I don't know what the answer is. It's a bit of a mess. It seems to me that the current system is designed to reward low-budget content that has high views, such as reality TV, and that with the decline of movie theatres, the meatier projects are getting left behind.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts